Improving 2nd gen brakes

Moderators: Regional Representative, Technical Advisor

Forum rules
Only fully subscribed club members may post in this section. Please keep these threads on topic.
Post Reply
G20BlazerTA
POC Jr. Poster
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:10 am
Year: 1979
Model: TransAm
Engine: 403
Name: PAUL
Location: Clacton-On-Sea
Location: Essex
Contact:

Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by G20BlazerTA » Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:40 pm

While i've got the whole front clip,front brakes and suspension stripped down i'm thinking I might as well improve the brakes a bit. I know there are aftermarket packages that you can fit but they're a bit out of my budget at mo.
Had been thinking of fitting the GM B body full size front brake spindles that come with 12 inch discs. Found a list of suitable donor vehicles for the spindles online,seems it's a common upgrade in US. Spindles are supposed to be a straight swap(same size upper and lower wishbone balljoints)and if you use the 12 inch 1LE discs from an 88-92 Camaro you keep the same wheel stud pattern and I think use the same wheel bearings if the spindle donor vehicle is 79 or later. 2nd gen calipers bolt straight onto the new spindles and as these only move out half an inch should still fit inside 15 inch wheels ok.
Will do some more research on this upgrade but wondered if anyone else has already done this ?

A quicker cheaper upgrade I found was to replace the standard D52 size front disc pads with D614 disc pads which as you can see from the photo use the same size metal backing plates but have a much larger surface area of braking material
Image
Might try a set of these on my 79 to see what difference they make.
Again,has anybody else already used these on a 2nd gen or any other yank that uses the same size front disc pad ?

liveseywhu
POC Newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:31 pm
Year: 1972
Model: trans am
Engine: 455
Location: essex
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by liveseywhu » Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:07 pm

i dont see what difference a bigger disc/rotor will make if you still use the original clipers, part of the bigger rotor will have no pad touching it ?
the bigger D164 pads sound ok but these still work on the original rotors

G20BlazerTA
POC Jr. Poster
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:10 am
Year: 1979
Model: TransAm
Engine: 403
Name: PAUL
Location: Clacton-On-Sea
Location: Essex
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by G20BlazerTA » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:08 pm

I wondered the same re the 12 inch rotors and same 2nd gen calipers mate but it must make a difference or a lot of 2nd gen owners in the states wouldn't do this swap on their cars would they ? Also,I think GM fitted the 12 inch rotors to the heavier Station Wagon models but kept the smaller 11 inch rotors on some of the B body saloon cars

SUPERCHARGEDGTA

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by SUPERCHARGEDGTA » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:12 am

bigger rotor/disc gives greater leverage for the caliper so improves braking

User avatar
carterdj
POC Newbie
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:58 pm
Year: 1977
Model: Trans Am
Engine: 400
Name: Darren
Location: Ipswich
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by carterdj » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:17 am

Have you tried the bigger pads yet ? I am interested in these options too, as the brakes on my 77 are not the best. Are the pads on a 77 & 79 the same ?

Rocky
POC Jr. Poster
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:08 pm
Year: 1978
Model: Trans am
Engine: 0
Name: Richard
Location: Watford
Location: Watford
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by Rocky » Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:32 am

We are doing a conversion at the moment to run corvette calipers and rotors.

4v8s
POC Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:04 pm
Year: 1977
Model: Firebird Formula
Engine: 403
Name: Aaron
Location: Kingston, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by 4v8s » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:19 pm

what the C3 4 pot calipers?

their quite problematic.

personally I find the brakes on my '77 pretty good. but then compared to all round non assisted drums on my mustang, anythings good!
Pontiac Firebird 403 Formula - 1977
Ford Mustang Convertible 289 - 1967
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible 350 - 1974
MG ZT 260 V8 SE - 2004 (Daily driver)
Rover 214Si 16V - 1994 (daily hack - owned since 1995!)

G20BlazerTA
POC Jr. Poster
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:10 am
Year: 1979
Model: TransAm
Engine: 403
Name: PAUL
Location: Clacton-On-Sea
Location: Essex
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by G20BlazerTA » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:23 pm

SUPERCHARGEDGTA wrote:bigger rotor/disc gives greater leverage for the caliper so improves braking
Bigger disc gives larger swept area even with same 2nd gen calipers,prob slightly better brake cooling and less fade too.
Slight increase in unsprung weight though.
Seems a lot of the B - body cars also had 11inch front discs and the 12inch discs were mainly put on the station wagons and heavy duty cars,ie,models that needed better brakes.

Link to one of the webpages i've been looking at - http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=182800
This page has other links on it too.
carterdj wrote:Have you tried the bigger pads yet ? I am interested in these options too, as the brakes on my 77 are not the best. Are the pads on a 77 & 79 the same ?
Not tried the bigger pads yet,might pick some up this week if shop has them - seems these bigger pads come in two thicknesses,we need the thinner of the two as the thicker ones wont fit in our calipers even with the piston fully retracted.
All 2nd gens use same size front pads as far as I know,as do a lot of other yanks.
Rocky wrote:We are doing a conversion at the moment to run corvette calipers and rotors.
Does the Corvette conversion you are doing fit inside standard 2nd gen 15inch wheels ?

Rocky
POC Jr. Poster
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:08 pm
Year: 1978
Model: Trans am
Engine: 0
Name: Richard
Location: Watford
Location: Watford
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by Rocky » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:56 pm

The conversion Im doing at the moment will not fit inside a 15" wheel but there are others available.

G20BlazerTA
POC Jr. Poster
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:10 am
Year: 1979
Model: TransAm
Engine: 403
Name: PAUL
Location: Clacton-On-Sea
Location: Essex
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by G20BlazerTA » Mon May 27, 2013 12:47 pm

G20BlazerTA wrote:While i've got the whole front clip,front brakes and suspension stripped down i'm thinking I might as well improve the brakes a bit. I know there are aftermarket packages that you can fit but they're a bit out of my budget at mo.
Had been thinking of fitting the GM B body full size front brake spindles that come with 12 inch discs. Found a list of suitable donor vehicles for the spindles online,seems it's a common upgrade in US. Spindles are supposed to be a straight swap(same size upper and lower wishbone balljoints)and if you use the 12 inch 1LE discs from an 88-92 Camaro you keep the same wheel stud pattern and I think use the same wheel bearings if the spindle donor vehicle is 79 or later. 2nd gen calipers bolt straight onto the new spindles and as these only move out half an inch should still fit inside 15 inch wheels ok.
Will do some more research on this upgrade but wondered if anyone else has already done this ?

A quicker cheaper upgrade I found was to replace the standard D52 size front disc pads with D614 disc pads which as you can see from the photo use the same size metal backing plates but have a much larger surface area of braking material
Image
Might try a set of these on my 79 to see what difference they make.
Again,has anybody else already used these on a 2nd gen or any other yank that uses the same size front disc pad ?
Got a set of the Powerstop 1995 Chevy Impala 614 pads via Rock Auto the other day to use in place of the standard D52 pads that came with their pad and rotor kit.
Just test fitted them in calipers and they are fit the same as the standard pads(no modification needed) but have more brake lining surface area so should improve stopping power a bit.
Here's a pic showing difference between the two sets of pads.
http://s1244.photobucket.com/user/Blaze ... d.jpg.html

I reckon there must be an extra 10% or so increase in lining surface area in contact with rotor.

User avatar
bhm1712
Site Admin
Posts: 2672
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 4:58 pm
Membership No: 20-607
Year: 2001
Model: Trans-Am WS6
Engine: 350
Name: Ian
Location: Nottingham
Location: Nottingham
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by bhm1712 » Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:29 am

The brakes on my second gen feel ok but I would love more stopping power. Might do a disc conversion at the rear one day, but those larger pads do look like they will potentially increase the stopping power if just slightly. Have you tested them yet?
Ian Hopkinson - Membership Manager & Forum Administrator
Northern England & Midlands Rep

Image

G20BlazerTA
POC Jr. Poster
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:10 am
Year: 1979
Model: TransAm
Engine: 403
Name: PAUL
Location: Clacton-On-Sea
Location: Essex
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by G20BlazerTA » Tue Jul 30, 2013 8:23 pm

bhm1712 wrote:The brakes on my second gen feel ok but I would love more stopping power. Might do a disc conversion at the rear one day, but those larger pads do look like they will potentially increase the stopping power if just slightly. Have you tested them yet?
No mate. I fitted the larger surface area D 614 pads to Bullnose but am a long way off testing them on that.
As I then had a spare set of the Powerstop standard size D52 ceramic pads I fitted those in place of the semi metallic pads on my 79 TA and noticed an improvement. So I guess the larger D614 pads should improve brakes a bit more but don't know for sure

User avatar
bhm1712
Site Admin
Posts: 2672
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 4:58 pm
Membership No: 20-607
Year: 2001
Model: Trans-Am WS6
Engine: 350
Name: Ian
Location: Nottingham
Location: Nottingham
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by bhm1712 » Fri Aug 02, 2013 10:53 pm

Ok.

Ideally id like to go for a larger rotor on the front, drilled and grooved as well as vented, with some double pot callipers as a minimum, with a pair of 12 inch rotors at the rear with standard single pot callipers. That should nicely do my engines power... but at the same time, theres so many things i want to do to improve mine i just cant spend all my spare cash on it! as much as id love to, i would end up sleeping in the shed. Problem is i dont have a shed anymore.
Ian Hopkinson - Membership Manager & Forum Administrator
Northern England & Midlands Rep

Image

User avatar
bhm1712
Site Admin
Posts: 2672
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 4:58 pm
Membership No: 20-607
Year: 2001
Model: Trans-Am WS6
Engine: 350
Name: Ian
Location: Nottingham
Location: Nottingham
Contact:

Re: Improving 2nd gen brakes

Post by bhm1712 » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:10 am

Interesting to note that AutoPontiac are now offering front disc conversions to SSBC twin pot callipers that fit under 15" wheels and also rear disc conversions for Drum brake rear axles. Photos can be found on the Autopontiac facebook page for those of you who partake in the facebook.

http://www.autopontiac.co.uk
Ian Hopkinson - Membership Manager & Forum Administrator
Northern England & Midlands Rep

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests